Да, есть, но… (+)
>Есть ли факты осуждения или наказания немецких солдат, представителями немецкой администрации за убийство или насилие над мирным населением оккупированных территорий СССР?
В книге "Sex Crimes under the Wehrmacht" (ссылку на книгу в .PDF могу дать)
упоминается несколько случаев осуждения немцев за изнасилования. Наказания достаточно мягкие -- небольшие тюремные сроки, никаких расстрелов. При этом, как правило подчёркивается, что наказания были редки и немцы осуждались не за изнасилования как таковые, а за то что пострадал престиж армии, либо как подрыв дисциплины и нарушение приказа и т.д.
Например (цитаты):
Perceiving a link between racism and sexual assault, Beck suggests that military courts viewed the rape of Russian women as a trivial crime because, according to National Socialist ideology, the Soviet people had “no concept of female sexual integrity.” For this reason, the military judicial authorities ignored most sexual assaults. When the authorities did prosecute offenders, they did so in order to maintain military order
and discipline. Nevertheless, mild punishments, according to Beck, proved to be the rule, rather than the exception.
Take, for example, the 1942 case of canoneer Heinz B. The Court of the 339th Infantry Division sentenced him to four years of penal servitude for raping a Russian woman four times in two days. The Gerichtsherr confirmed the verdict and ordered the punishment completed.The court heavily weighed Heinz B.’s four previous convictions by civilian and military courts and his repeated disciplinary punishments when imposing the sentence. However, it focused primarily on the crime’s potential impact on the partisan movement and excoriated the defendant in a long diatribe. The severe punishment, the court stated, was less for the “protection of the sexual honor of the injured Russian” than for the fact that Heinz B. “damaged the interests of the German armed forces to the greatest extent (auf der erheblichste).”
The court again focused on immediate military problems in the case of Walter U. He was sentenced in 1942 to two years’ imprisonment for raping a sixteen-year-old Russian girl. “There are,” reflected
the court, “certainly more vulgar and brutal forms” of rape. Nevertheless, he had committed his crime at a time when “his comrades [were] putting their lives on the line for their Fatherland in the front trenches.”
...
Walter U. was in fact paroled six months later. He subsequently committed a new offense (which could not be identifi ed from the available documents). After returning to Field Penal Battalion 9 to serve the new sentence as well as the remaining portion of his initial punishment, he had to be disciplined several times in the following months.
