|
|
От
|
realswat
|
|
|
К
|
lagr
|
|
|
Дата
|
14.07.2010 17:25:05
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Современность; Флот;
|
|
Есть такое:
http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/9005lessonsiraniraqii-chap14.pdf
Some reports claim that the Exocets launched through 1984 scored a very
high ratio of hits: 52 out of the 53 missiles hit their targets, and only two out of 53 clearly failed to explode. Other sources indicate that the Exocets have experienced a number of detonation problems, similar to those fired in the Falklands, although it is difficult to tell whether the missiles' proximity and/or delay fuses failed or Iraqi arming and service crews should be blamed. Thisillustrates another lesson of war: The acute difficulty in getting reliable data on the actual performance of individual weapons systems.
The Exocets and other small missiles generally failed to "kill" large merchant ships. They did, however, significant damage to 11 out of 17 tankers hit in 1984, which displaced over 50,000 tons, and slightly damaged six. The Exocets were more effective against smaller vessels, and against more complex or automated ships (the automated Safina al-Arab had to be written off because her machinery was too sophisticated to repair), and against ships where the hit happened to trigger a fire. Seven of the 33 small to medium-sized vessels were sunk, 19 were heavily damaged, and only seven received slight damage.
То есть для танкера более 50 000 т одного Экзосета оказывалось мало - но это более чем ожидаемый результат. По меньшим кораблям результат более серьёзный. 7 потопленных и 19 тяжело поврежденных из 33.
И особенно интересно, что "Экзосет был более эффективен против более сложных и автоматизированных судов", что вполне относится к военным кораблям.