|
|
От
|
Грозный
|
|
|
К
|
jim~garrison
|
|
|
Дата
|
25.11.2014 00:58:29
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Современность;
|
|
да, 2 года уже всю триаду трясут
Причина понятна - обделены начальственным вниманием, финансированием и перспективой.
Например -
Hagel called for the two reviews in late January, after an embarrassing scandal in the Air Force in which dozens of officers overseeing nuclear missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana had been caught either cheating on a monthly launch proficiency test, or knew about others who did and did nothing to stop it.
>Там какой-то грандиозный распил намечается или чего они так?
Ну уже есть разговорчики в Конгрессе - русские наступают, всё пропало, шеф, пора новую дубину вырезать и пр.
ВошПост:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2014/11/13/pentagon-to-overhaul-nuclear-weapons-programs-following-review/
Форбс бил в набат намедни про то, как русские уже пришли с новым поколением ракет, уверенные в превосходстве над отсталым американским арсеналом:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/11/20/could-russias-new-nuclear-weapons-win-world-war-iii/
Letting our nuclear arsenal fall into disrepair is one thing (Washington Post), but allowing Russia to build a new strategic nuclear weapons force more advanced than ours is another thing altogether. And they even have a new generation of missiles.
So Russia does think it has the upper hand. And they might, if Putin and the hard-liners are willing to use force as much as they seem lately.
===> dic duc fac <===