|
|
От
|
Albert
|
|
|
К
|
All
|
|
|
Дата
|
22.05.2002 19:35:43
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Современность; Армия;
|
|
"transformational" амеровских ВС, похоже доктрина юзания ВС изменилась
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44956-2002May20.html
"
Even Iraqi artillery "outranges" and "outguns" U.S. artillery. Sadly, we still live in a world in which on-paper capability is confused with real capability.
....
Then there are the arguments against Crusader. Mostly that it is too big. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld loves to say that it would take 64 C-17 airliners to move 18 guns into a battle. "The question is where do you land them, how do you move them, will they go across a bridge with those kinds of weights?," he said last week.
......
that a new generation of weapons and sensors would "transform" the new platforms into superior systems to improve air defenses and bombing ability.
Why is the Air Force's articulation of its need for F-22 any sounder than the Army's desire for Crusader? Because there is a sense that airpower is more relevant than heavy ground forces for the types of conflicts that the United States will have to face in the coming years and decades
"
Вообщем требуется реализовать
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24019-2002May15.html
"such as increased accuracy, more rapid deployability and "networked" combat"
Несмотря на то что у Ирака пушки лучше. Т.е. амеры начинают хоронить программы тяжёлого вооружения для сухопутных войск, в первую очередь из-за rapid deployability. Соответственно тпревентивное применение в малых и больших дозах ВТО без объявления войны похоже считается панадолом и станет нормой так сказать Quake3 эдак 3-6 часов.