От Llandaff Ответить на сообщение
К Flanker Ответить по почте
Дата 13.07.2021 18:14:09 Найти в дереве
Рубрики Современность; Флот; Версия для печати

Re: Да не...

>Кстати где почитать эту историю с ограничением по форсажу подробней?

https://www.defenseworld.net/news/26992/Swiss_Internal_Report_Flags_F_35_Afterburner_Issue#.YO2tSiMmw2w

The heat from afterburner exhaust causes the F-35 B/C jets to experience “bubbling and blistering” of its radar-absorbent material (RAM) and of horizontal tail surfaces and boom.

Sensitive sensors buried inside the skin of the rear tail surfaces are also susceptible to damage.

The US military reportedly faced the same problem in 2011: F-35B and F-35C flying near their maximum service ceiling of 50,000 feet damaged themselves using their afterburners to attain speeds of Mach 1.3 and 1.4.

Following the incident, the Marines instituted a policy requiring F-35B pilots not to engage afterburners for more than 80 seconds cumulatively at Mach 1.3, or 40 seconds at Mach 1.4. Navy F-35C pilots have 50 seconds at Mach 1.3 to ration. Three minutes of non-afterburning flight to cool down the tail area was suggested to “reset” the afterburner allowance.