От	А.Елисеенко
К	Аркан
Дата	16.08.2006 18:47:07
Рубрики	WWII; Танки;

Кто заявил? (-)

---

---

От	Аркан
К	А.Елисеенко (16.08.2006 18:47:07)
Дата	17.08.2006 21:14:42

США, в оспрее видел. И еще почти столько же обычных панцеров (-)

---

---

От	А.Елисеенко
К	Аркан (17.08.2006 21:14:42)
Дата	18.08.2006 03:27:08

Тогда это потери Фалеза (-)

---

---

От	Аркан
К	А.Елисеенко (18.08.2006 03:27:08)
Дата	18.08.2006 10:24:58

Ошибся чуток:)

---

Я вам сумму назвал:)

Итак потери немцев:

Of the 616 tanks and assault guns committed to the Lorraine fighting in September, there were only 127 still operational by 1 October. Losses had amounted to 101 P/.Kpfw IVs, 118 Panthers, and 221 assault guns and lank destroyers. A further 148 armored vehicles were on hand but were damaged and in need of repair. German losses in men and equipment in Lorraine were far higher than those of the Americans -and far more difficult to replace.

амеров:

Total Third Army armored vehicle losses in September included 49 light tanks and 151 medium tanks and tank destroyers. A total of 392 tanks were issued in September, so by the end of the month, Third Army had more than replaced all of its losses.

CAMPAIGN 77
LORRAINE 1944
PATTON vs MANTEUFFEL

---

От	А.Елисеенко
К	Аркан (18.08.2006 10:24:58)
Дата	18.08.2006 10:41:43

Странные сведения. Американские занижены. (-)

---

---

От	Аркан
К	А.Елисеенко (18.08.2006 10:41:43)
Дата	18.08.2006 11:48:52

А какие еще есть? Я про эти бои не слишком хорошо знаю. (-)

---

---

От	А.Елисеенко
К	Аркан (18.08.2006 11:48:52)
Дата	18.08.2006 13:15:11

Около 200 на всем ЗФ. Вечером уточню (-)

---

---