Краткое содержание - эти безоткатки и снаряды поставлялись в Ливию и в Чад в конце 70ых (Ливия) и 80ые (Чад):
Полный текст.
75mm and 106mm recoilless rifle cartridges
215. The Panel identified a range of 75mm and 106mm recoilless rifle cartridges
within JEM stores seized during the Omdurman attack. Among them the following
types were identified: M310A1 model high-explosive squash head cartridges; M344
A1 model high-explosive anti-tank cartridges; NR 160 A1 model tracer composition
B cartridges; NR 601 model high-explosive anti-tank tracer compound A3
cartridges; M94B1 model high-explosive anti-tank and anti-personnel cartridges and
M310A1 model high-explosive anti-tank composition B cartridges.
216. With the assistance of the Government of the United States it was established
that the 106mm M344 A1 model cartridges were provided by United States
manufacturers through the United States foreign military sales programme to the
Government of Chad between 1983 and 1987. These details were received late in
the mandate, consequently the Panel has not been able to follow up with the
Government of Chad.
2. Libyan stockpiles
217. Chain-of-ownership tracing undertaken by the Panel identified several items
used during the battles in Omdurman as having been delivered from the
manufacturer to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. These items are of pre-embargo
production and include Spanish-produced 106mm M40 A2 recoilless rifles with
.50 M8 spotting rifles attached; a number of Belgian-produced 106mm recoilless
rifle cartridges; and Bulgarian-produced PG7 anti-tank grenades and PG7P expelling
charges. Formal letters of assistance were submitted to the Governments of the
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Spain and Belgium with a view to identifying the chain of
ownership of these items.
218. The Panel also travelled to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in person to discuss
these and other issues related to the mandate with the Libyan Government. The
meetings requested with representatives of the Military Procurement Department
and the Ministry of Defence were unfortunately not deemed possible during the
Panel’s visit. The Panel did meet, however, with representatives of the departments
of security and disarmament affairs, aviation, foreign affairs, intelligence and
international organizations. The responses attributed to Libyan authorities below
were received during that meeting. The Panel also asked for the responses to be put
in writing, as it routinely does when making formal requests for assistance from
member countries. Libyan authorities declined to provide responses in that form.